The Wisconsin Court of Appeals has ruled that Waukesha County family court Judge Aprahamian had committed at least 4 erroneous acts of contempt charges against Julie Valadez and ordered the acts of contempt against her reversed and cause remanded with directions.
Julie Valadez v. Ricardo Valadez case history, article by Hispanic News Network U.S.A.
By H. Nelson Goodson
Hispanic News Network U.S.A.
February 7, 2022
Waukesha, Wisconsin - The Wisconsin Court of Appeals sides with Appellant Julie Valadez in her appeals claiming that Waukesha County family court Judge Michael J. Aprahamian had abused his authority and had committed numerous illegal or erroneous acts during the proceedings in the divorce case Julie Valadez v. Ricardo Valadez, in which Judge Aprahamian held Julie in contempt multiple times for merely trying to exercise her rights as afforded under state law during a post-divorce case involving her four children.
Julie Valadez confirmed that the Wisconsin Court of Appeals reversed a total of 4 erroneous contempt charges, which total 5 reversals.
Judge Aprahamian erroneously filed contempt rulings against Julie during the post-divorce proceedings without any legal basis and violated Julie's due process in the case by not following State law summary contempt procedures that require court hearings of the contempt violations.
Julie and her former attorneys had repeatedly filed motions for Judge Aprahamian to recuse himself from the case and each time he refused to do so.
Since the Wisconsin Court of Appeals reversed Judge Aprahamian's illegal contempt violations against Julie, she filed for substitution of Judge Aprahamian and Aprahamian had to sign off the case by law due to his erroneous rulings of contempt charges against Julie.
February 2, 2022 Wisconsin Court of Appeals case Julie Valadez v. Michael J. Aprahamian rulings 2021AP994/2021AP1186 (26 pages) and 2021AP1436 (13 pages)
No comments:
Post a Comment