Saturday, December 18, 2021

Motion To Vacate Waukesha County Court Branch 9th Illegal Order Prohibiting Divorced Mother, Julie Valadez From Seeing Her Child Filed

Motion to vacate order dated April 13, 2021 that was filed on Friday at the Waukesha County Clerk of Courts, which claims  Waukesha County family Court Judge Aprahamian from Branch 9th erred in his decision to prohibit divorced mother, Valadez from seeing her autistic son without any due process, also without holding any court hearings to determine, if parental rights warranted prohibition by State law to end parental rights for Julie and instead Judge Aprahamian made his decision to prohibit Valadez from seeing her son based on Guardian ad Litem attorney Jasmer's filing to prohibit Valadez from seeing her son based on unproven allegations and hearsay, according to a seven page filing by Attorney Sulton representing Valadez.

By H. Nelson Goodson 
Hispanic News Network U.S.A.

December 18, 2021

Waukesha, Wisconsin - On Friday, Attorney William F. Sulton from the Sulton Lawfirm LLC representing Julie Valadez in the Waukesha County case Julie Valadez v. Ricardo Valadez #2018FA000296 filed a Motion For An Order Vacating The Order Of April 13, 2021. Attorney Sulton claims that Waukesha County family Court Judge Michael J. Aprahamian erred in his decision to prohibit divorced mother, Julie Valadez in April from seeing her son Ethan who is autistic without ever holding a court hearing as required by State law to determine, if Julie would actually have her parental rights removed and would be prohibited from seeing or visiting her son unsupervised. But instead, Judge Aprahamian allegedly based his decision without any due process, nor did he held any court hearing for Julie to challenged his decision based on Guardian ad Litem (GAL) attorney Molly Jasmer's unproven allegations and hearsay filing to prohibit Julie from seeing her son.

The 7-page motion to vacate the April 13, 2021 decision by Aprahamian is no doubt evident that Aprahamian erred in his decision to prohibit Julie from seeing her son without due process or any evidence that would legally prohibit Julie from actually seeing her son.

Julie in her determination as a mother to see her four autistic children, which has not been allowed to legally see them for over nine months has done everything right to legally challenge Judge Aprahamian without anyone holding the judge accountable for his alleged illegal decisions to prohibit Julie from seeing her children in the divorced case. Julie has even exposed GAL attorney Jasmer for allegedly filing a false order with a local hospital to prevent Julie from seeing her own son while being treated. Julie filed a Waukesha police report about the incident and police weren't able to get a copy of Jasmer's false document prohibiting Julie from visiting her son at the hospital that was filed by Jasmer.

No comments: